Scrotal hematoma, the accumulation
of blood in the scrotal sac, is a common postoperative complication of
castration in dogs. (Fig. 1)
Postoperative bleeding from one or both testicular
arteries or veins is the most likely cause. Bleeding from these vessels can
also accumulate in the abdominal cavity and be unrecognized until the dog
becomes hypovolemic and develops shock. Bleeding from subcutaneous tissues
could also result in a scrotal hematoma but is less likely, particularly in
cases where bleeding is severe and the scrotal hematoma is large.
Fig. 1: Scrotal hematoma that developed after castration in this golden retriever |
Etiology
Insecure ligatures are probably the
cause of bleeding from testicular vessels. Ligature failure during castration may
be due to a number of technical problems, such as loose ligature, improper
suture material, or ligature slippage. Improper location of the suture ligature
can also predispose to failure. If the spermatic cord is not adequately
exteriorized the ligatures will be placed too close to the testicle. (Fig. 2)
This causes excessive tissue to be incorporated in the ligatures. Insufficient stripping of the adipose tissue from the cord also predisposes the ligature to slippage.
This causes excessive tissue to be incorporated in the ligatures. Insufficient stripping of the adipose tissue from the cord also predisposes the ligature to slippage.
Treatment
Scrotal hematomas can be managed
medically with compresses (ice packs for the first 24 hours postoperatively, followed by warm
compresses), Elizabethan collar, restricted exercise, analgesics such as NSAIDS, and antibiotics.
In severe cases or those not responding to medical therapy, scrotal ablation is
necessary to remove the entire scrotum and its contents.
Prevention
To prevent scrotal hematoma when
performing castration, adhere to the following technical principles:
- After incising over the testicle
and exposing it, break down the gubernaculum testis and place traction on the
testicle to allow several centimeters of the spermatic cord to be exposed.
(Fig. 3)
Fig. 3: Proper exposure and clamping of the spermatic cord during routine canine castration. |
- Carefully and thoroughly strip
the adipose tissue from the spermatic cord with a moistened surgical sponge.
- Triple clamp the cord with Carmalt
clamps, cut between the 2 clamps closest to the testicle and perform routine ligatures with
Monocryl or PDS suture (transfixing and full ligatures). The full ligature is
placed in the crush area of the most proximal clamp after it is removed, the
transfixing ligature is placed just distal to the full ligature. (Fig. 4)
- Check the vascular stump for
bleeding prior to replacing it into the incision. Repeat the same procedure on
the opposite side.
I prefer closed castration, even on large dogs, because it allows excision of the testicular tunics along with the testicle. (Fig. 5)
I prefer closed castration, even on large dogs, because it allows excision of the testicular tunics along with the testicle. (Fig. 5)
Close the subcutaneous tissue
routinely (3-0 or 4-0 absorbable suture in a simple continuous pattern).
Although skin sutures can be used on the skin incision, I prefer do an
intradermal closure in lieu of skin sutures. Fewer complications occur with an
intradermal closure of castration incisions. In an unpublished study performed
at Ohio State several years ago, dogs with intradermal skin closure had fewer
incisional problems and even fewer scrotal hematomas postoperatively. Less
self-trauma to the incision and scrotum were thought to be the reason for this
finding.
__________________________________________________________________
When seriously ill pets are surrounded with love, they are more likely to survive. Read about this in Dr. Birchard's new book: "Their Tails Kept Wagging". Click here for more information.
Acknowledging that this is a pretty old post at this point, thanks for your helpful discussion Dr Birchard, and your many years of instruction from which so many of us have benefited. With regard to the surgery discussed here, I curious about the comment that you prefer the closed castration technique “because it allows excision of the testicular tunics along with the testicle.” I’ve heard/read similar sentiments in the past with the same curiosity. When I started doing these surgeries, back in the early ‘90s, I had occasion to talk with another practitioner who’d been out of school for several years longer than I, and the question of open vs closed came up. He said that he preferred the former, because “I like to be able to see what I’m ligating.” That observation made a lot of sense to me and, for the most part, that’s how of done them since, numbering maybe 10,000 (or probably more) by now. (In addition to full service clinics, I’ve spent many years at shelters and other high volume spay/neuter clinics.) After all these years I could certainly be mistaken about this, but, to my knowledge, I’ve never had a scrotal hematoma. (I have done a few ablations though!) The other advantage I’ve found with the open technique is that, in very many (maybe most) cases, I can simply instrument tie the vessels/vas exactly as is done by me and many other veterinary surgeons with tom cats, greatly reducing surgery times. (That said, the truly big guys I still ligate.) Used selectively as I have, I’ve not had issues with this technique either. (If it’s useful in a cat, why not in a dog?) Anyway, just thought I’d ask. Thanks again!
ReplyDeleteAcknowledging that this is a pretty old post at this point, thanks for your helpful discussion Dr Birchard, and your many years of instruction from which so many of us have benefited. With regard to the surgery discussed here, I curious about the comment that you prefer the closed castration technique “because it allows excision of the testicular tunics along with the testicle.” I’ve heard/read similar sentiments in the past with the same curiosity. When I started doing these surgeries, back in the early ‘90s, I had occasion to talk with another practitioner who’d been out of school for several years longer than I, and the question of open vs closed came up. He said that he preferred the former, because “I like to be able to see what I’m ligating.” That observation made a lot of sense to me and, for the most part, that’s how of done them since, numbering maybe 10,000 (or probably more) by now. (In addition to full service clinics, I’ve spent many years at shelters and other high volume spay/neuter clinics.) After all these years I could certainly be mistaken about this, but, to my knowledge, I’ve never had a scrotal hematoma. (I have done a few ablations though!) The other advantage I’ve found with the open technique is that, in very many (maybe most) cases, I can simply instrument tie the vessels/vas exactly as is done by me and many other veterinary surgeons with tom cats, greatly reducing surgery times. (That said, the truly big guys I still ligate.) Used selectively as I have, I’ve not had issues with this technique either. (If it’s useful in a cat, why not in a dog?) Anyway, just thought I’d ask. Thanks again!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments Dr. Scheule. I appreciate your observations and thoughts. Like many surgeries, the choice of technique is based on sound principles and surgeon preference. Either closed or open castration is certainly acceptable and consistent with current standards of care. My choice of the closed technique is due to seeing problems with infection secondary to the tunics left in the scrotum. The few cases I've seen of this problem has biased me toward removing the tunics with the testicle and vessels. But, I have not seen either technique have a higher incidence of scrotal hematoma. I probably should make that more clear in the article. Thanks again for your insight and allowing the readers to benefit from your broad experience. SJB
Delete